So, did the early Christians invent the resurrection of Jesus? What that means is that God took the initiative to save us, in and through Jesus Christ, and there is nothing we must or can do to make our own salvation possible. We trust in Him alone for our salvation, but we also trust in Him moment by moment, as we go through our lives and face various challenges and opportunities. His encounter with the risen Christ serves as an important case in point as we ponder the question of faith vs. Throughout biblical history, there have been those who doubted.
Later Sarah, the wife of Abraham, laughed when God told her she would have a son in her old age. The terrible judgment was that she turned into a pillar of salt Genesis She was torn between following God and living life in her own way. Curse God and die! Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble? Later on, the Israelites in the wilderness wanted to go back to Egypt and accused Moses of bringing them into the desert to die.
What have you done to us by bringing us out of Egypt? It would have been better for us to serve the Egyptians than to die in the desert! Actually, this is more than just doubt; this is outright unbelief. Can anything good come from there? He was skeptical. The Pharisees kept asking Jesus for signs when He had already performed numerous signs right before their very eyes. What will you do? They demanded tangible proof, or else they refused to believe.
Now what did Jesus do? He simply told them that He was the Bread of Life, and challenged them to believe. Many scholars today profess to find in 1 Corinthians 15 a conception of the resurrection at variance with the Easter faith evident in the Gospels, the book of Acts, and the historic Christian creeds. However, there is no scholarly or exegetical basis for this conclusion. The specific way in which Paul shapes his argument, the structure of the syntax in which his thought is given expression, and the lexical meaning of his key terms, re veal that he conceived of resurrection as a tangible, physical e vent involving the body of flesh and bones.
In 1 Corinthians 15, as in the Gospels and Acts, the resurrection is understood as the miraculous revivification of the mortal body of flesh and bones, and its transformation so as to be imperishable. By James P. Ware The resurrection narratives in the Gospels portray Jesus as raised to life on the third day in his crucified body, leaving behind him an empty tomb. The Contemporary Debate Regarding 1 Corinthians 15 1 Corinthians 15 is by far the fullest treatment of the Christian hope of resurrection within the entire Bible.
Four observations are crucial: Within —49, which is structured by twelve antithetically paired verbs that is, six pairs of verbs denoting death or the mortal state and resurrection or the risen state , the subject of these antithetical verbal pairs is one and the same both for verbs denoting death, and those denoting resurrection see the diagram.
This basic observation, which is nonetheless commonly ignored by interpreters, has profound exegetical implications. Paul does not describe resurrection as an event in which x the present body is sown, but y a body distinct from the present body is raised, but in which a sing le x the present body is sown a perishable x , but raised an imperishable x. In —58, which is structured by seven verbs denoting resurrection or transformation see the diagram , it is again the present perishable body which is the subject of this resurrection and transformation , , — These additional verbs are significant, for the y each express, in different ways, not the annihilation or replacement of the fleshly body, but its revival zoopoieo , investiture phoreo, enduo , and transformation alasso.
As we saw, the series of contrasts within —54 bet ween the ante-mortem and risen body do not occur in the subject of these periods, but in their predicates verbs and verbal complements. And these predicate complements see the diagram above invariably describe a change of quality rather than of substance , in which what was once perishable, dishonored, weak, and mortal is endowed with imperishability, glory, power, and immortality —43; — So at least that much was not too good to be true.
This exegesis ignores the Lukan meetings on the day of the resurrection. DickHarfield, your answer would be stronger if you referenced an actual Greek dictionary, not user 'Luke Wilson' at Scribd.
And how does the archaic meaning of an English word what word? Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie Ozzie In addition to word studies and lexicons, how a word is used conveys meaning. The expectation a Jewish person had about the future was that God would gather all of the Jewish people back to a restored kingdom of Israel: The LORD will then be king over all the earth.
In particular, each year all nations are expected to come to Jerusalem to worship at the time of the Feast of Tabernacles: Then all who survive from all the nations that came to attack Jerusalem will go up annually to worship the King, the LORD who rules over all, and to observe the Feast of Temporary Shelters.
So what did those disciples who worshiped Jesus on the mountain do? Revelation Lad Revelation Lad Heather Heather 1. JWallace JWallace 1. I'm very grateful for your participation here. We're a little different from a forum, so do take the site tour if you haven't already. Answers are expected to have informed argument, cite evidence primary and secondary.
I think you can benefit a lot if you see the kind of answers that this site is looking for. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile. Linked Related Hot Network Questions.
Some early traditions called him Judas Thomas, because some Syriac manuscripts claimed his real name was Judas. But that would probably just cause more confusion for us today, since there are already multiple Judases in the Bible, and one of them did a pretty bad thing.
But according to the more popular church tradition, Thomas travelled to India around 50 AD and evangelized the people there, possibly establishing as many as seven churches. This tradition appears to have begun with the Acts of Thomas , and it remains immensely popular in some churches—especially those claiming to have been established by him. According to the synoptic gospels Matthew , Mark , and Luke , the other disciples doubted the resurrection, too:. It was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the others with them who told this to the apostles.
But they did not believe the women, because their words seemed to them like nonsense. The refusal of the disciples to believe the testimony of those who had seen the risen Lord is a common feature of the gospel tradition Matt ; Mark , 14; Luke —43 ; the fourth Evangelist alone has chosen Thomas to represent and symbolize this doubt.
Even though Jesus repeatedly revealed his plans to the disciples, they never understood the cross and resurrection until after the fact. And as Jewish men, they apostles had no reason to believe the Messiah would rise from the dead.
It flew in the face of their tradition. And despite everything the apostles saw and heard that proved Jesus was unlike anyone who ever lived, he died just like everyone else. After Jesus appears to the disciples, Peter gets antsy and decides to go fishing, and some of the other disciples tag along:. Aside from the four lists of disciples, Thomas is mentioned four more times in the Bible—all of which occur in the Gospel of John.
Here are the passages where we actually learn something about him. When Jesus learns that his friend Lazarus has died, he tells his disciples that they must return to Judea.
0コメント